Explaining Postmodernism (Expanded Edition)
Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Prueba gratis de 30 días de Audible Standard
Compra ahora por $18.08
-
Narrado por:
-
Scott R. Smith
Tracing postmodernism from its roots in Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant to their development in thinkers such as Michel Foucault and Richard Rorty, philosopher Stephen Hicks provides a provocative account of why postmodernism has been the most vigorous intellectual movement of the late 20th century.
Why do skeptical and relativistic arguments have such power in the contemporary intellectual world? Why do they have that power in the humanities but not in the sciences? Why has a significant portion of the political left - the same left that traditionally promoted reason, science, equality for all, and optimism - now switched to themes of anti-reason, anti-science, double standards, and cynicism?
Explaining Postmodernism is intellectual history with a polemical twist, providing fresh insights into the debates underlying the furor over political correctness, multiculturalism, and the future of liberal democracy.
This expanded edition includes two additional essays by Stephen Hicks: "Free Speech and Postmodernism" and "From Modern to Postmodern Art: Why Art Became Ugly".
©2004 Stephen Hicks (P)2018 Stephen HicksLos oyentes también disfrutaron:
Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:
Excellent Work
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Excellent book
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Essential to understand the culture wars.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Well worth the listen.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
While the author is clearly not a fan of pomo, he doesn't set up any strawmen. In many parts of the book he didn't even provide an opinion after giving an account of some history.
While accessable, I wouldn't start with this book because it assumes a degree of knowledge of the main people and events.
Accessable academic work by philosopher
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.