• Federal and state authorities report investigating hospice and home health care fraud in California, primarily involving Medicare and Medicaid billing.

• A federal anti‑fraud task force, formed in mid‑March, is described as coordinating with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to identify providers showing indicators of improper billing.

• According to figures cited, hundreds of hospice providers and several dozen home health agencies in California have had payments suspended while investigations are ongoing, involving an estimated hundreds of millions of dollars in suspended or questioned claims.

• A significant portion of the flagged providers are located in Los Angeles County, with authorities citing patterns such as unusually high billing volumes, shared addresses among many licensed hospices, and lack of evidence of active operations.

• Law enforcement actions mentioned include search warrants, arrests, and criminal charges against individuals accused of submitting fraudulent claims for hospice services that were allegedly unnecessary or not provided.

• Investigators allege some schemes involved:

  • Enrolling beneficiaries who did not meet hospice eligibility criteria
  • Billing for “phantom” patients or services
  • Using stolen or improperly obtained personal information
  • Operating multiple hospice entities from the same physical location

• California state officials and the state Department of Justice are reported to be conducting hundreds of active investigations, sometimes in coordination with federal agencies such as the FBI and CMS.

• State audits and prior investigations had previously flagged weaknesses in licensing oversight, including multiple providers sharing addresses, insufficient inspections, and limited enforcement capacity.

• Proposed or mandated regulatory reforms discussed include:

  • Enhanced background checks for hospice operators
  • Restrictions on multiple hospice licenses at a single address
  • Increased on‑site inspections
  • Stronger pre‑licensing verification requirements

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Senate Republicans’ Border Security Strategy

• Senate Majority Leader John Thune announces plans to advance border security funding through a budget reconciliation bill.
• Reconciliation allows legislation to pass the Senate with a simple majority (51 votes), avoiding the usual 60‑vote requirement.
• Republicans intend to move forward without Democratic support if necessary.
• The proposal would provide multi‑year funding for border enforcement agencies.

2. Intended Border Enforcement Measures

• Increased funding for ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and CBP (Customs and Border Protection).
• Additional resources for enforcement operations, personnel, and technology.
• Framed as a response to public frustration with border security and as a national security priority.
• Timed to show decisive action ahead of upcoming elections.

3. Political Significance of Reconciliation

• The use of reconciliation is presented as a sign of urgency and resolve by Republican leadership.
• It bypasses bipartisan negotiation, which is described as unlikely in the current political climate.
• Supporters argue it prevents border enforcement funding from being stalled by political gridlock.

4. Allegations Against the Biden Administration

• The text claims the Biden administration worked closely with pro‑abortion organizations to monitor and prosecute pro‑life activists.
• Emails reportedly show coordination between the Department of Justice, the FBI, and abortion‑rights groups.
• Pro‑life activists were allegedly monitored before being charged with crimes.

5. Use of the FACE Act

• The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act was allegedly used disproportionately against pro‑life protesters.
• The law was originally intended to protect both abortion clinics and crisis pregnancy centers.
• The text claims enforcement focused heavily on peaceful actions such as praying, singing, or blocking clinic entrances.

6. Data Collection and Surveillance

• Pro‑abortion groups allegedly provided dossiers to the DOJ containing personal data on pro‑life activists.
• Information reportedly included addresses, photos (including family members), travel plans, and identification details.
• Some individuals were monitored for years prior to being charged.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.