A First-Rate Madness Audiobook By Nassir Ghaemi cover art

A First-Rate Madness

Uncovering the Links Between Leadership and Mental Illness

Preview

Audible Standard 30-day free trial

Try Standard free
Select 1 audiobook a month from our entire collection of titles.
Yours as long as you’re a member.
Get unlimited access to bingeable podcasts.
Standard auto renews for $8.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

A First-Rate Madness

By: Nassir Ghaemi
Narrated by: Adam Barr
Try Standard free

$8.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy for $18.00

Buy for $18.00

The New York Times bestseller

“A glistening psychological history, faceted largely by the biographies of eight famous leaders . . .” —The Boston Globe

“A provocative thesis . . . Ghaemi’s book deserves high marks for original thinking.” —The Washington Post

“Provocative, fascinating.” —Salon.com

Historians have long puzzled over the apparent mental instability of great and terrible leaders alike: Napoleon, Lincoln, Churchill, Hitler, and others. In A First-Rate Madness, Nassir Ghaemi, director of the Mood Disorders Program at Tufts Medical Center, offers a myth-shattering exploration of the powerful connections between mental illness and leadership and sets forth a controversial, compelling thesis: The very qualities that mark those with mood disorders also make for the best leaders in times of crisis. From the importance of Lincoln's "depressive realism" to the lackluster leadership of exceedingly sane men as Neville Chamberlain, A First-Rate Madness overturns many of our most cherished perceptions about greatness and the mind.
History & Theory Modern Political Science Politics & Government Psychology & Mental Health Franklin D. Roosevelt Abraham Lincoln Leadership Mental Health Psychology Biographies & Memoirs Historical Winston Churchill Health Military Socialism

Critic reviews

“A glistening psychological history, faceted largely by the biographies of eight famous leaders . . . A First-Rate Madness is carefully plotted and sensibly argued.” —The Boston Globe

“Ghaemi isn’t the first to claim that madness is a close relative of genius, or even the first to extend the idea into politics. But he does go further than others . . . His explanations are elegant, too—intuitively accurate and banked off the latest psychiatric research.” —Newsweek

“A provocative thesis . . . Ghaemi’s book deserves high marks for original thinking.” —The Washington Post

“Ghaemi is a remarkably disciplined writer, and he examines both psychiatry and history with impressive clarity and sensitivity. A First-Rate Madness will almost certainly be one of the most fascinating books of the year, not just because of the author's lucid prose and undeniable intelligence, but because of his provocative thesis: 'For abnormal challenges, abnormal leaders are needed.'” —NPR.org

“Provocative, fascinating.” —Salon.com

People who viewed this also viewed...

The Hypomanic Edge Audiobook By John D. Gartner cover art
The Hypomanic Edge By: John D. Gartner
All stars
Most relevant
Engaging and informative with clarification on historical leaders and the events that shaped our world. Shows us we are all somewhere on the neurotic spectrum and leaders are not immune.

Excellent read.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

I loved the deep dives into the historical figures and their temperaments. Temperaments are something which isn’t often taken seriously these days.

Ghaemi is brilliant.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

The similarities between great leaders and depression are uncanny. He delves into why some of the most outstanding leaders in history likely had depression, bipolar disorder, and its closely related relative hyperthermia and dysthymia.

Thought-provoking

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

Loved the insight as a doctor of public health. Author is a psychiatrist and professor at Tufts.

Solid, evidence-based

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

This is frustratingly not "scientific" as author claims. Study sample is hand picked to prove his theory. Uses one study of all white men to define "normal" and misses obvious counter points. Horribly unpersuasive.

not scientific

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.