Babies by Design Audiobook By Ronald M Green cover art

Babies by Design

The Ethics of Genetic Choice

Preview

Audible Standard 30-day free trial

Try Standard free
Select 1 audiobook a month from our entire collection of titles.
Yours as long as you’re a member.
Get unlimited access to bingeable podcasts.
Standard auto renews for $8.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Babies by Design

By: Ronald M Green
Narrated by: David Wood
Try Standard free

$8.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy for $19.10

Buy for $19.10

Already technology enables parents to select some genetic traits for their children, and soon it will be possible to begin to shape ourselves as a species. Countering loud cries of alarm, bioethics expert Ronald Green explains why our fears about genetic engineering are overblown and how we can move forward responsibly to create a better future.

©2007 Yale University Press (P)2007 Yale University Press
Evolution & Genetics Biological Sciences Biotechnology Genetics Medical Ethics Technology Science Social Sciences Medicine & Health Care Industry Computer Science Physical Illness & Disease

Listeners also enjoyed...

How We'll Live on Mars Audiobook By Stephen Petranek cover art
How We'll Live on Mars By: Stephen Petranek

Critic reviews

"In this clear-eyed and generally optimistic book, both promise and risk are ably weighed and balanced. The science is clearly explained, and there are signposts to help guide us through the moral maze." ( The Economist)
All stars
Most relevant
This is an accessible and informative book an interesting biological problem.

The author has clearly put effort and thought into the "ethics" aspect, but I feel like he doesn't have the philosophical background to do it justice. For example, he tends to call controversial things "ethically dubious" or that something is "a serious concern" merely because it's unpopular. These are appeals to popularity on the one hand, and avoid confronting uninformed, irrational public opinions using science. I suspect this populist bent is intended to avoid bristling readers with a bias against genetic engineering. I don't agree that watering down is the best strategy here. If I were writing this book, I would have said "some people see this thing as ethically dubious and here's why they're incorrect" and "something has been called a serious concern by people who make the following mistake". Being confrontational is not worse than being disingenuous.

He develops an ethical framework that distinguishes interventions that fight disease from interventions that provide enhancement. This distinction is unhelpful because "disease" and "enhancement" include baggage like status quo bias and naturalness bias. He does better on the topic of safety, where there is an objective medical reality to point to.

Strong on the science, weaker on the ethics

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.