Convenient Suspect

A Double Murder, a Flawed Investigation, and the Railroading of an Innocent Woman

By: Tammy Mal

Narrated by: Suehyla El-Attar

On Thursday, December 15, 1994, Joann Katrinak and her three-month-old son, Alex, went missing from their Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, home. Four months later, when their bodies were found in a lonely patch of woods, the police would launch a three-year investigation leading to the arrest of Patricia Lynne Rorrer - a young mother who had never met either victim - as the monster responsible.

In what would become Pennsylvania's first use of mitochondrial DNA in a criminal case, Patricia Rorrer was quickly tried, convicted, and sentenced to life in prison without parole. But did the jury make the right decision? Is Patricia Rorrer truly guilty? As new evidence continues to surface, including allegations of prosecutorial misconduct and evidence tampering, that question requires an answer even more.

With a subject matter and storytelling style reminiscent of the hit podcast Serial, Convenient Suspect will appeal to a wide audience. The audiobook reveals information never before made public - information gathered directly from more than 10,000 official documents, including Pennsylvania State Police reports, FBI files, forensic lab results, and the 6,500-page trial transcript. Through four years of intensive research, countless interviews with those involved, and hundreds of letters, phone calls, and personal visits with Patricia Rorrer, the truth about the evidence used to convict her can finally be revealed.

©2017 Tammy Mal (P)2017 ListenUp Audiobooks

It's worth the read

I couldn't stop listening to it. It was a very interesting and a very sad story.

Quote great book unquote

Loved the story it hit close to home. Well written also. I don't know if it's actually written in the book or not but all the quote unquote made it hard to listen to at times. Otherwise great book

"Quote. End Quote"

I actually really enjoyed the book. Well written and researched. I'll be honest in saying I did find the the constant "quote and end quote" around every line of dialogue kind of disruptive. It took away from the flow of the book and got downright annoying in some sections. I really liked the reader though, and perhaps there were reasons the book was read like that? I listen to many true crime books and this was the first where I noticed this issue. Other than that niggle it was a good book, and sure does make you wonder about the way the investigation was handled.

Very very one sided

All evidence supporting guilt was glanced over while all other evidence was questioned as a huge sweeping conspiracy. “As with Andy’ is not a defense. There seemed to be a lot of diverse evidence against her. And when the hair was tested after the case and matched to patty, the author argues ‘why was the victim’s dna not also on the hair’. What a stretch, very biased

Great great great until...

this was great until midway through. the author started with QUOTE - UNQUOTE. For nearly everything. it was not needed. It ruined the whole book in the audible sense. Very irritating. I was totally into the story. what a shame.