Cyclone Bracketology | Iowa State Cyclones LIVE #59
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to Cart failed.
Please try again later
Add to Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Adding to library failed
Please try again
Follow podcast failed
Please try again
Unfollow podcast failed
Please try again
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
- Welcome to Iowa State Cyclones Live; shift from football to basketball/March Madness.
- Iowa State is a #2 seed in the Midwest Region.
- Host is organizing chaotic group merch efforts with CF After Dark crew.
- Looking for a potential co-host — interested people can DM on X/Discord or email.
- Tennessee State: Ohio Valley Conference champ, low/mid-major profile.
- KenPom projects ~24-point Iowa State win.
- TSU strengths: Decent 3-point shooting (Aaron Akuma ~34%, Travis Harper ~42%), good FT% (~76%), okay offensive rebounding.
- Weaknesses: Poor overall offense (#173 KenPom), little else stands out.
- Iowa State advantages: Elite defense (forces TOs, contests shots), recent offensive surge (last 5 games very strong, recent form hides earlier lull).
- Verdict: Safe double-digit win barring major laziness/early hot shooting from TSU's shooters.
- Potential 2nd round opponents: Winner of Kentucky (#7) vs. Santa Clara (#10).
- Kentucky: Long/athletic but inconsistent, poor shooting outside a few guys, young/expensive roster, borderline home crowd advantage.
- Santa Clara: Excellent offensive rebounding (#9), strong 3PT% (~35%), multiple shooters (40%+ guys), low TOs, but very poor FT attempts and mediocre defense.
- Levi leans Santa Clara wins (doesn't trust Kentucky's inconsistency).
- Iowa State vs. Santa Clara concerns: Shooters can punish slow rotations; no-middle defense vulnerable if ball swings.
- vs. Kentucky: Length/athleticism but limited backup plan if rim attacks fail; Iowa State's pressure likely causes havoc.
- Slight preference to face Santa Clara (Cyclones should score consistently), but matchup feels riskier due to volume shooting threat.
- Other Midwest notes:
- Virginia over Tennessee (Tennessee in offensive slump, Virginia balanced + better shooters).
- Alabama over Hofstra (Hofstra dangerous upset pick — can score, Alabama weak post/no D).
- Texas Tech over Akron (with Christian Anderson healthy).
- Michigan over Georgia/St. Louis winner.
- Sweet 16 projection: Iowa State over Santa Clara → Virginia.
- Virginia: Slow pace (#354), good rim protection/blocks, mediocre offense outside offensive rebounding; hard to grind vs. ISU defense.
- Michigan: Post-heavy (Yaxel Lendeborg dominant), mediocre guards, similar to Arizona style but weaker perimeter.
- Iowa State advantages: Experience vs. post-heavy teams (Arizona, Kansas, etc.), elite guard play (Toure pressure), trapping potential on Lendeborg.
- Verdict: Winnable; ISU takes it to Final Four (first since 1944).
- Other regions quick hits:
- Duke over TCU/Kansas path.
- Arizona over BYU (despite AJ DeBonsa's potential heroics).
- Florida over Houston/Illinois path.
- Final Four: Iowa State over Arizona (third matchup; hard to beat great team 3×; ISU nearly won last time despite subpar nights from key players).
- Championship: Iowa State over Florida.
- Florida: Strong post (Condon, Chinielu) but poor 3PT volume/shooting; essentially "Arizona but worse at shooting."
- Scout advantage: Florida lacks live experience vs. ISU pressure vs. Arizona's two games.
Three realistic outcomes only:
- Lose in Round of 32 to Santa Clara (hot shooting + defensive lapse).
- Lose in Elite Eight to Michigan (post dominance overwhelms).
- Win the whole thing (if they reach Final Four, momentum/vibes carry them).
- Team hot: BartTorvik has ISU as #1 in country last 5 games.
- Keys: Make jumpers, limit turnovers → long run possible.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
No reviews yet