In this episode, Eric Trexler and Eric Helms delve into the complexities of scientific research integrity, recent controversies in nutrition studies, and debunk common myths in health and fitness. They emphasize the importance of transparency, ethics, and critical thinking in science and everyday beliefs. In this episode, Eric Helms and Eric Trexler debunk popular myths in psychology, medicine, and animal behavior, exploring the science behind Stockholm syndrome, the hungry judge effect, stress ulcers, sugar hyperactivity, and the Stanford Prison Experiment. They emphasize critical thinking and scientific rigor in understanding complex topics.

If you're in the market for some new lifting gear or apparel, be sure to use code "MRR10" at elitefts.com for a 10% discount

Chapters
00:00 Introduction
03:23 Update on LDL Research Controversy
14:30 "Ethics" in the Research Context
26:45 Conspiratorial thinking and communication in science/research
29:45 Pop Science Myths and Misconceptions
39:25 Debunking Learning Styles
48:17 Debunking Stockholm Syndrome
1:02:04 Debunking the "Hungry Judges Study"
1:07:53 Stress Ulcers: The Complex Truth Behind a Common Belief
01:13:42 Debunking the "Sugar Rush" Myth
01:25:23 Other Popular Myths and Misconceptions

In this episode, Eric Helms and Eric Trexler explore the complexities of food labeling, energy absorption, and the impact of food choices on energy balance. They discuss a recent lawsuit against David protein bars, delve into scientific research on metabolizable energy, and practical strategies for dieting and food selection.

If you're in the market for some new lifting gear or apparel, be sure to use code "MRR10" at elitefts.com for a 10% discount

Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Updates
08:16 The David Protein Bar Lawsuit
21:43 Labeling Complications and Nutritional Misunderstandings
25:25 The Impact of TEF, Fiber, and Resistant Starches
34:00 The Impact of the Specific Food Matrix
37:22 More Research on Dietary Intake Versus Absorption
40:06 Nuances Behind Calories In vs Calories Out
47:00 Tracking Variable Foods Versus Keeping Food Choices Consistent (IIFYM/Flexible Dieting Implications)
57:06 The Case for "Eating Clean" Within a Flexible Dieting Framework

Editorial note:
We recorded this episode on March 4. This is an important detail for contextualizing the timeline of events discussed in this episode, as well as our understanding of the matter at the time of recording.
Since we recorded this episode, the paper discussed has been officially retracted. We will provide additional updates on this story as they become available.

Episode summary:
Join Eric Trexler and Eric Helms as they dissect the chaotic rollout of a controversial study on LDL cholesterol and lean mass hyper responders, explore issues in science communication, and debate the integrity of research in the age of social media.

If you're in the market for some new lifting gear or apparel, be sure to use code "MRR10" at elitefts.com for a 10% discount

Chapters
00:00 Intro
09:18 Social media dust-up
17:27 Revisiting the "Lean Mass Hyper Responder Study"
23:25 New controversy surrounding the study
33:14 Investigations regarding data integrity
41:43 Historical Context: NUSI and Its Implications
50:55 Steelmanning the argument
55:22 Potential issues with the "citizen science" movement
01:01:50 The death of expertise and the future of science communication