Send us Fan Mail

What happens when prosecutors charge parents for their child’s school shooting?

In this episode of Justice Seekers, we break down the landmark Crumbley case, a recent Georgia murder conviction, and emerging cases where parents are charged before an attack occurs.

We explore criminal negligence, parental liability, gun access, warning signs, and how prosecutors are redefining responsibility in mass shooting cases.

Can failing to act become a crime? And where does the law draw the line?

Mixed & Edited by Next Day Podcast

info@nextdaypodcast.com

Send a text

Theranos promised a revolution in blood testing: hundreds of lab results from a single drop of blood.

The idea made Elizabeth Holmes one of Silicon Valley’s most celebrated founders and brought Theranos machines into Walgreens pharmacies across the country.

But behind the promise, the technology wasn’t working.

In this episode of Justice Seekers, Natalie and Katrina break down the Theranos scandal through the lens of criminal fraud law. Why did so many sophisticated investors believe? What happens legally when a company claims a product works when it doesn’t? And why did prosecutors focus on investor fraud instead of patient harm?

Because fraud cases rarely look dramatic in real time. They look like emails, meetings, pitch decks—and small decisions that slowly compound.

By the time the law steps in, the trust has already been broken.

Mixed & Edited by Next Day Podcast

info@nextdaypodcast.com

Send a text

In this episode of Justice Seekers, attorneys Natalie Stubbs and Katrina break down the constitutional rules behind some of the most important criminal procedure cases in American history. These decisions define what police can do, what your rights are, and what happens when the government crosses the line.

But this isn’t a law school lecture.

It’s a plain-language guide to the constitutional guardrails that apply when real people encounter law enforcement—from interrogations and searches to roadside traffic stops.

If you’ve ever wondered:

• When do police have to read Miranda rights?
• What does “I want a lawyer” actually do legally?
• Can officers search your car without a warrant?
• What is reasonable suspicion vs. probable cause?
• How long can a traffic stop legally last?

This episode walks you through the landmark cases that answer those questions.

Send a text

In this episode of Justice Seekers, attorneys Natalie and Katrina break down how civil litigation, independent forensic review, and federal civil rights law reopened an investigation many believed was finished and how procedural law ultimately reshaped the path toward accountability.

We explore the legal mechanisms that allowed Sandra’s case to move forward, including wrongful death litigation, internal police investigations, federal jurisdiction, grand jury indictments, and the complex pretrial motions now shaping the upcoming federal trial.

This episode focuses on the law behind the headlines, and the difficult question at the center of the case:

What happens when the justice system must reexamine its own conclusions?

Send a text

Send a text

A small Texas town. A brutal murder. A husband with a solid alibi, and a conviction built on blood evidence that modern science now calls unreliable.

In 1985, schoolteacher Mickey Bryan was found murdered in her home. Prosecutors claimed bloodstain analysis proved her husband, Joe Bryan, was the killer — despite being over 100 miles away at the time.

What followed was a decades-long fight exposing junk forensic science, overlooked suspects, and a justice system determined to defend its own theory.

In this episode of Justice Seekers, we uncover how one piece of questionable evidence helped send an innocent man to prison for more than 30 years and why his conviction but not his imprisonment still stands today.

Because sometimes the most dangerous evidence… looks like science.

🎙️ Follow Justice Seekers for true stories of wrongful convictions and the fight for justice.

Send us a text

In this episode of Justice Seekers, we revisit one of the most infamous criminal trials in American history: The People v. O.J. Simpson.
What happens when overwhelming evidence collides with police misconduct, racial tension, media spectacle, and a deeply divided jury? We break down the case beyond the headlines, examining how the prosecution lost control of a winnable case, how the defense reshaped reasonable doubt, and why the verdict still sparks debate decades later.

Send us a text

In this episode of Justice Seekers, we examine the controversial death of 28-year-old teacher Ellen Greenberg — a case initially ruled a homicide, then quietly changed to suicide despite more than twenty stab wounds and troubling forensic inconsistencies.

Through a legal lens, we break down how early assumptions shaped the investigation, the significance of the locked door theory, missing evidence, and the Greenberg family’s years-long civil battle for transparency and accountability.

Was this a tragically misclassified death — or a system too quick to close the case?