Across the United States, the First Amendment has been under fire from a variety of sources. In this episode, host Jivan Ramesh sits down with two passionate lawyers to talk about their own experiences with the first amendment. Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty goes into the chilling effect of the ICE actions in Minneapolis on free speech, while Amy Greer of Dratel and Lewis discusses her experience representing Mahmoud Khalil after he, a lawful permanent resident and pro-Palestinian activist, was targeted for deportation just over a year ago.

Please note, the positions and opinions expressed by the speakers are strictly their own, and do not necessarily represent the views of their employers, nor those of the D.C. Bar, its Board of Governors or co-sponsoring Communities and organizations.

Resources:

• The Warren Letter on "unprecedented use of Section 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)"

• The summary of the Khalil case from the New York Civil Liberties Union

• The AAUP v. Rubio case materials

Want to get ahead of the pack? Joining the D.C. Bar Law Student Community (LSC) can get you there. Your LSC membership will provide resume and skills boosting opportunities and one-on-one access to local practicing attorneys. To learn more, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠click here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

Co-hosts Jivan Ramesh and Sophia Wang meet with two brilliant policymakers, Delaware Lt. Gov Kyle Evans Gay and VA-11 U.S. Rep. James Walkinshaw, for a discussion on policy making and how legislators view the law. They discuss how laws get made behind the scenes, and share insight on how law students and young lawyers can begin getting involved.

Please note, the positions and opinions expressed by the speakers are strictly their own, and do not necessarily represent the views of their employers, nor those of the D.C. Bar, its Board of Governors or co-sponsoring Communities and organizations.
Want to get ahead of the pack? Joining the D.C. Bar Law Student Community (LSC) can get you there. Your LSC membership will provide resume and skills boosting opportunities and one-on-one access to local practicing attorneys. To learn more, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠click here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

The Supreme Court has long relied on stare decisis, or the principle of following precedent, to ensure stability and legitimacy. But is that changing? In this episode, Amanda and Sade explore the Court’s evolving approach from Casey to Dobbs to Students for Fair Admissions with insights from constitutional law expert Beth Hecker and experienced litigation attorney Kimberly Russell on what the decline of stare decisis means for American law.

Please note, the positions and opinions expressed by the speakers are strictly their own, and do not necessarily represent the views of their employers, nor those of the D.C. Bar, its Board of Governors or co-sponsoring Communities and organizations.

Want to get ahead of the pack? Joining the D.C. Bar Law Student Community (LSC) can get you there. Your LSC membership will provide resume and skills boosting opportunities and one-on-one access to local practicing attorneys. To learn more, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠click here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.